|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 1-7
Rapid quantitative estimation of metformin and ertugliflozin in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandam mass spectroscopy and its application to pharmacokinetic studies
P Venkateswarao Rao1, A Lakshmana Rao2, SVUM Prasad3
1 Vikas college of Pharmacy, Vissannapeta and PhD Research Scholar, JNTUK Kakinada, AP, India
2 V. V. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gudlavalleru, AP, India
3 School of Pharmacy, JNTUK Kakinada, AP, India
|Date of Submission||11-Sep-2019|
|Date of Decision||12-Apr-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||22-Sep-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||03-Jan-2021|
M. Pharm (PhD) P Venkateswarao Rao
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Vikas College of Pharmacy, Vissanapeta, Krishna DT, AP-521215
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background The development of sound bioanalytical liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) method(s) is of paramount importance during the process of drug discovery and development, eventually culminating in marketing approval. The use of oral antidiabetic agents has been increased significantly from past decades, and till now, no bioanalytical method is available for quantitation of metformin (MET) and ertugliflozin (ERT) in the biological matrix that can be applied in bioequivalence studies using LC-MS/MS.
Objective To study the use of highly responsive simple liquid–liquid extraction method development using deuterated MET and deuterated ERT, LC-MS/MS method for gradation of MET and ERT in the rat plasma.
Materials and methods The chromatographic condition involves isocratic mode using Waters XBridge C18 3.5 μ (150×4.6 mm) column. Mobile phase was 0.1% orthophosphoric acid and acetonitrile in the ratio of 80 : 20 v/v. Detection was carried out on a triple quadrapole MS employing electrospray ionization technique, operating multiple reactions, monitoring with the transitions of m/z 258.2→174.1, m/z 250.1→210.2, m/z 258.2→174.1, and m/z 260.3→210.2 for MET, ERT, deuterated MET, and deuterated ERT, respectively, in the positive ion mode.
Results and conclusion The method has been validated, and the linearity was observed in the range of 10–150 ng/ml and 0.1–1.5 ng/ml for MET and ERT, respectively. For intraday and interday %RSD, the values were found to be within the acceptable limits. Recovery studies for MET and ERT obtained, mean recovery of 99.5 and 98.6%, respectively. A battery of stability studies like bench-top stability, autosampler stability, freeze-thaw stability, and long-term stability were performed. Highly responsive simple LC-tandem MS assay method was developed and witnessed for the gradation of MET and ERT in the rat plasma; the developed method was applied to pharmacokinetic studies.
Keywords: ertugliflozin, liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy, metformin, method validation, pharmacokinetic study
|How to cite this article:|
Rao P V, Rao A L, Prasad S. Rapid quantitative estimation of metformin and ertugliflozin in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandam mass spectroscopy and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. Egypt Pharmaceut J 2021;20:1-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Rao P V, Rao A L, Prasad S. Rapid quantitative estimation of metformin and ertugliflozin in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandam mass spectroscopy and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. Egypt Pharmaceut J [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 May 15];20:1-7. Available from: http://www.epj.eg.net/text.asp?2021/20/1/1/306299
| Introduction|| |
An oral antidiabetic drug used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes is metformin (MET), and chemically, it is 3-(diaminomethylidene)-1, 1-dimethylaniline ([Figure 1]). MET is an oral antihyperglycemic agent of the biguanide class and used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. MET is the first drug of choice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. So MET is considered as an antihyperglycemic agent because it lowers blood glucose concentration in type 2 diabetes without causing hypoglycemia. Control of high blood sugar levels helps to prevent kidney damage, nerve problems, blindness, loss of limbs, and sexual problems. MET helps restore body’s proper response to the insulin as well as helps in the natural production of insulin. It also decreases the amount of sugar level made by the liver and that absorbed by the stomach and intestines ,,,,,.
Ertugliflozin (ERT) is in a class of medication called sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which belongs to gliflozin class and is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It lowers blood sugar level by causing the kidneys to get rid of more glucose in the urine. Chemically, ERT is (1S,2S,3S,4R,5S)5-(4-chlorp-3-(4-ethoxybenzyl)phenyl)-1-(hydroxymethyl)-6,8-dioxabicyclo octane-2, 3, 4-triol, with (2S)-5oxopyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid ([Figure 2]). In the United states, it was approved by the FDA for use as monotherapy and as affixed dose combination with either sitagliptin or MET ,,,.
A strategy is discussed for the validation of chromatographic methods that are developed to quantify drugs in biological matrices . According to the literature survey, several liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectroscopic (MS) methods have been reported for the determination of MET ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and ERT  individually and in combination with other drugs in biological matrices. No methods have been reported for the estimation of MET and ERT in biological matrices by LC-MS/MS. In this work, an attempt has been made to develop a simple, rapid method for the simultaneous determination of MET and ERT in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and application to the pharmacokinetic studies.
| Materials and methods|| |
Chemicals and reagents
Acetonitrile [high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade], orthophosphoric acid (OPA) (analytical grade), and water (HPLC grade) were purchased from Merck (India) Ltd (Worli and Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). All API’s of MET and ERT as reference standards were procured from spectrum Pharma Research Solution Pvt Ltd (Hyderabad, India). The combination of the formulation was procured from the local market.
The experimental protocols were approved by the institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) constituted under Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experimental Animals (CPCSEA) (Regd. No: 1736/PO/Re/S/14/CPCSEA).
HPLC system (waters alliance E2695 model) with MS QTRAP 5500 triple quadruple instrument was used. Data processing was performed with Empower 2.0 software (Waters coperation, 34 maple street, Milford, MA, USA).
Chromatographic separation was carried out in an isocratic mode at room temperature using Waters XBridge C18 (150×4.6 mm, 3.5 μ) column. The mixture of 0.1% OPA and acetonitrile 80 : 20 v/v was used as mobile phase, and the flow rate was maintained at 1.0 ml/min. The injection volume was 10 μl, and eluents were monitored at 258 m/z using PDA detector. The run time was 5 min.
Preparation of standard and quality control samples
MET and ERT stock solutions were prepared for the calibration curve and quality control samples for validating the method and for patient sample analysis. MET and ERT stock solutions were prepared to obtain the concentrations of 1000 and 10 ng/ml, respectively. From the stock solutions, working standard and primary dilutions were prepared with diluent. Screening of blank rat plasma was carried out before spiking so that it was free from any endogenous interference at the retention time of MET and ERT. By spiking the blank plasma with appropriate amount of MET, seven-point standard curve and four quality control samples were prepared. Sample calibration was done at concentrations of 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ng/ml of MET and 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.5 ng/ml of ERT.
For the sample preparation, 200 μl of plasma sample, 300 μl of acetonitrile, 500 μl of internal standard, 500 μl of standard stock, and 500 μl of diluent to precipitate all the proteins were used and mixed in the vortex cyclo mixer. Centrifugation was done at 500 rpm for 30 min. Collection of the supernatant solution in the HPLC vial was done, followed by injection it into the chromatogram.
Method validation ,,,
Analysis of six different rat plasma selectivity was performed for testing the interference of analytes at the retention times ([Figure 3] and [Figure 4]).
Matrix effect for MET and ERT was evaluated by comparing the peak area ratio in the postextracted plasma sample from six different drugs’ free blank plasma samples and neat reconstitution samples. This experiment is performed in low-quality control (LQC), medium-quality control (MQC), and high-quality control (HQC) levels in every three different preparations from the marketed formulation with six different lots of rat’s plasma. Finally, the recovery is within the acceptable limit (%CV) of less than or equal to 15%.
Precision and accuracy
It was done in six different quality control samples (n=6) from marketed formulation at a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), LQC, MQC, HQC levels are extracted to plasma. The %CV should be less than 15% for accuracy at LQC, MQC, and HQC, except LLOQ, which should be within 20%.
The extraction efficiencies of MET and ERT were determined by analysis of six replicates at each quality control concentration. The percentage recovery was evaluated by comparing the peak area of extracted standards to the peak areas of unextracted standards.
The stability of the samples is comparing the area response of area response versus sample prepared from the freshly prepared sample solution. Stability studies were performed at the LQC and HQC concentration levels using six replicates at each level in plasma. In bench-top method, the stability of spiked rat plasma samples stored at room temperature (bench-top stability) was evaluated for 24 h. Autosampler stability sample are spiked with rat plasma at LQC, QC, and HQC, and they are stored at 2–8°C in an autosampler (autosampler stability) and were evaluated for 24 h. The autosampler stability was determined by comparing the extract plasma samples that were injected immediately, with samples that were reinjected after storing in the autosampler at 2–8°C for 24 h. The reproducibility was determined by comparing the extracted plasma samples that were injected immediately, with the samples that were reinjected after storing autosampler at 2–8°C for 24 h. The freeze-thaw stability was conducted by comparing the stability samples that had been frozen at 30°C and thawed three times with freshly spiked quality control sample. Six aliquots at each of LQC and HQC concentration levels were used for the freeze-thaw stability evaluation. Moreover, the studied drug showed stability in rat plasma when storing the sample at 200°C for 1 month as long-term stability when compared with the freshly prepared sample as per US FDA guidelines; all stability condition samples were stable below 15%.
| Results and discussion|| |
In this method, electrospray ionization having maximum response over atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mode has been selected. Method optimization of instrument was done to give sensitivity and signal stability during infusion of the analyte in the continuous flow of mobile phase to electrospray ion source operated at both polarities at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. MET and ETR gave more positive response in ion mode when compared with negative ion mode.
Trails have been performed to obtain the best chromatographic conditions with different columns such as C18, C8, and CN-propyl, and mobile phases which are composed of 0.1% OPA and acetonitrile were tested. Best chromatographic separation was occurred on XBridge C18 column by using the mobile phase 0.1% OPA and acetonitrile in 80 : 20 ratios at a flow rate 1 ml/min, and detection was carried out at 258 m/z by PDA.
Selectivity and sensitivity
Blank plasma spiked with lower limit quantification was obtained as a representative chromatogram. Between six different lots of rat plasma, the percentage mean interference observed at the retention time of analytes, which included hemolyzed and lipedemic plasma containing K2EDTA as an anticoagulant, was 0.00 and 0.00% for MET and ERT, respectively, and was within the acceptance levels. At LLOQ level from the six replicates of extracted samples, one of the plasma samples having the least interference at the retention time of MET and ERT has been prepared and analyzed. The six replicates %CV area ratios of samples were observed as 1.1% for MET and 1.5% ERT, respectively.
At MQC level, the percentage of coefficient of variation of ion suppression/enhancement in the signal was found to be 1.0% for MET and ERT, indicating that the matrix effect on the ionization of analyte is within acceptable range under these conditions.
The peak area ratios of calibration standards in each assay over the nominal concentration range of 10–150 and0.1–1.5 ng/ml for MET and ERT were observed, respectively ([Table 1]). Linearity of calibration was described well by least square regression lines ([Figure 5] and [Figure 6] and [Table 1]); the correlation coefficient was more than or equal to 0.9999 for MET and ERT, respectively.
Precision and accuracy
Polling of all individual assay results of replicate of five separate batch runs has been analyzed on four different days for inter-run precision and accuracy determination. The inter-run precision (%CV) was less than 5% and inter-run accuracy was between 95 and 105% for MET and ERT, respectively ([Table 2] and [Table 3]).
Low-quality, medium-quality, and high-quality concentration levels of MET and ERT of six aqueous (sample spiked reconstitution-solution) were prepared for recovery for determination; the area obtained for extracted samples was analyzed with the same batch run on the same day. For MET and ERT, mean recovery was 99.79% and precision was 0.52%, which indicates the extraction efficiency for MET and ERT.
Reproducibility of the samples was checked by performing back calculated concentration for reinjected samples and change was less than 2.0% at LQC and HQC concentrations. Sample was prepared to be reinjected after 24 h, and they also showed percentage changes less than 2.0% at LQC and HQC concentration levels.
MET and ERT stock solution stability was performed by preparing in stock solutions with diluents and storing at 2–8°C in a refrigerator. Aforementioned stock solutions were compared with the stock solutions prepared 24 h before. For MET and ERT, the percentage change observed was 1.27 and 0.75%, respectively, which indicates the stock solutions were stable for at least 24 h. Bench-top and autosampler stability for MET and ERT was investigated at LQC and HQC levels.
Stability of MET and ERT was not affected and was confirmed by repeated freezing and thawing of spiked plasma sample at LQC and HQC levels; they were stable in plasma in for at least 24 h at room temperature as well in an autosampler at 20°C. In case of long-term stability studies for MET and ERT, they were stable in the matrix for 24 h at a temperature of −30°C ([Table 4] and [Table 5]).
Application to pharmacokinetic study
LC-MS/MS method was developed and has been applied for the analysis of MET and ERT in plasma samples obtained from rats and also applied to the pharmacokinetic studies. MET and ERT were coadministered by oral gavage at a dose 2.5 and 0.0375 mg/kg, respectively. The test/reference ratios for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0–∞ were within 80–125% for all analytes. The 90% confidence interval of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for MET and ERT are expressed. The detailed pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0–∞) of MET and ERT are presented in [Table 6].
| Conclusion|| |
Validated highly sensitive HPLC-ESI-MS/MS has been developed for the determination of MET and ERT simultaneously in rat plasma. A fast, rugged, reproducible simple bioanalytical method has been developed that can be used in pharmacokinetic studies along with the monitoring of the investigated analyte in the body fluids. High recovery with liquid–liquid extraction method and lesser retention time is time saving when compared with other reported methods. The specified method was simple, specific, and rapid and allows for easy application in laboratories; moreover, it is a valuable tool for bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies.
The authors gratefully acknowledge ICON Laboratories, India and Vikas College of Pharmacy, Vissannapeta, India, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Psaroudakis D, Pundi J, Savnur P, Coomarasamy A, Bhide P, Thangaratinam S. Inositol treatment of ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome disease. Int J Obstetr Gynaecol 2017; 125:299–308.
Kollmann M, Martins WP, Raine Fenning N. Ultrasound evaluation of the ovaries in women with hyper androgenic an ovulation. Hum Reprod 2014; 20:463–464.
Triggle CR, Ding H. Metformin is an antihyperglycaemic drug. Acta Physiol 2017; 219:138–151.
Du Pont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med 2019; 370:1532–1540.
Koch KL, Frissora CL. Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2003; 32:201–234.
Singh P, Yoon SS, Kuo B. A review of pathophysiology and therapeutics. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016; 9:98–112.
Cetinkunar S, Erdem H, Aktimur R, Sozen S. Effect of bariatric surgery on humoral control of metabolic derangements in obese type 2 diabetes patients. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3:504–509.
Krentz AJ, Bailey C. Oral antidiabetic agents. Current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2005; 65:385–411.
Qatos DM, Alexander GC. Post marketing drug safety and FDA’s risk. J Am Med Assoc 2011; 306:1595–1596.
Franceschini G, Glli G, GalliKienle M, Bondioli A, Conti F. Disposition of metformin in man. Clin Pharma Therap 1978; 24:683–693.
Hartmann Z, Massart DL, McDowall RD. Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1998; 17:193–218.
Yadav A, Jain DK. Gastro retentive micro balloons of metformin: formulation development and characterization. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2011; 2:51–55.
Kumar P, Murthy T, BasaveswaraRao MV. Development, validation of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of rosuvastatin and metformin in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2015; 6:118–124.
] [Full text]
Singh G, Pai RS, Pandit V. Development and validation of a HPLC method for the determination of trans-resveratrol in spiked human plasma. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2012; 3:130–135.
Vemula P, Dodda D, Balekari U, panga S, Veeresham C. Simultaneous determination of linagliptin and metformin by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography method: an application in quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical dosage forms. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2015; 6:25–28.
] [Full text]
Al-Kuraishy HM, Gareeb AI, Waheed HJ, Al-Maiahy TJ. Differential effect of metformin and/or glyburide on apelin serum levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: concepts and clinical practice. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2018; 9:80–86.
Ouyang Y, Chen X, Zhang C, Bunyamanop V, Guo J. Metformin in ovarian cancer therapy: a discussion. Cancer Transl Med 2016; 2:119–124. [Full text]
Singh AK, Singh R. Metformin in gestational diabetes: an emerging contender. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2015; 19:236–244.
Lal J, Jain GK. Effect of centchroman co administration on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in rats. Indian J Pharmacol 2010; 42:146–149.
Abd EL-Sattar MM, EL-Kelany OA, EL-Halaby ADF, Esmaeel HM. Effect of metformin treatment on ovarian stromal blood flow in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Menoufia Med J 2019; 32:1371–1375.
Siavash M, Tabbakhian M, Sabzghabaee AM, Razavi N. Severity of gastrointestinal side effects of metformin tablet compared to metformin capsule in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. J Res Pharm Pract 2017; 6:73–76.
] [Full text]
Ceacareanu AC, Brown GW, Moussa HA, Wintrob ZAP. Application of a pharmacokinetic model of metformin clearance in a population with acute myeloid leukemia. J Res Pharm Pract 2018; 7:41–45.
] [Full text]
Sarif NK, Jacob JT, Prakash V. Stability indicating UV spectrophotometric method for linagliptin and metformin in pharmaceutical dosage form. Pharm Methods 2017; 8:121–126.
Neelima K, Rajendra Prasad Y. Analytical method development and validation of metformin, voglibose, glimepiride in bulk and combined tablet dosage form by gradient RP HPLC. Pharm Methods 2014; 5:27–33.
Pandit V, Pai RS, Devi K, Singh G, Narayana S, Suresh S. Development and validation of the liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of metformin, pioglitazone, and glimepiride in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Pharm Methods 2012; 3:9–13.
] [Full text]
Bhoyar PK, Amgaonkar YM. Taste masking and molecular properties of metformin hydrochloride-indion 234 complexes. J Young Pharmacists 2011; 3:112–118.
] [Full text]
Rahim BN, Naser T, Somayeh T, Saeed S. Gastric floating matrix tablets of metformin Hcl: design and optimization using combination of polymers. J Rep Pharma Sci 2016; 5:67–79.
Wanjari MW, There AW, Tajne MR, Chopde CT, Umathe SN. Rapid and simple RPHPLC method for the estimation of metformin in rat plasma. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008; 70:198–202.
] [Full text]
Venkateswara Rao P, Lakshana Rao A, Prasad SVUM. A new stability indicating RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form its validation as per ICH guidelines. Indo Am J P Sci 2018; 05:2616–2628.
Tiwari G, Tiwari R. Bioanalytical method validation: an updated review. Pharm Methods 2010; 1:25–38.
Pandey S, Pandey P, Tiwari G, Tiwari R. Bioanalysis in drug discovery and development. Pharm Methods 2010; 1:14–24.
] [Full text]
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), Biopharmaceutics. Guidance for industry, bioanalytical method validation, U.S. Embassy New Delhi, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi; 2018.
Bressolle F, Bromet PM, Audran M. Validation of liquid chromatographic and gas chromatographic methods. Applications to pharmacokinetics. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 1996; 686:3–10.
Rozet E, Marini RD, Ziemons E, Boulanger B, Hubert P. Advances in validation, risk and uncertainty assessment of bioanalytical methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011; 55:848–858.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]