|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 138-143
Comparative studies of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus onto functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes for soyasapogenol B production
Hala A Amin1, Ahmed A Haroun2
1 Department of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
2 Chemical Industries Research Division, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
|Date of Submission||06-Sep-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Oct-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||26-Dec-2017|
Hala A Amin
Department of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, 12622
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective This research focuses on the microbial transformation of soybean saponins to soyasapogenol B (SB) by Aspergillus flavus cells producing saponin hydrolase (CSH) as a whole-cell biocatalyst. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) have been reported to have several properties that render them ideal support systems with the advantage of being further functionalizable at their surface.
Materials and methods CSH was covalently immobilized onto carboxy-functionalized MWCNTs by different methods including direct immobilization as well as immobilization by glutaraldehyde or carbodiimide chemistry.
Results and conclusion Results showed that direct immobilization of CSH onto oxidized MWCNTs was the best method accompanied by about an 80% immobilization yield. The optimum temperature was around 50°C for both the free and the immobilized CSH (MWCNTs–CSH conjugate). The apparent activation energy (Ea) was increased from 1.05 to 2.84 kcal/mol by immobilization. The immobilized enzyme also showed significantly improved thermal stability. The calculated half-life values of MWCNTs–CSH conjugate at 70, 80, and 90°C (55, 33.3, and 29.7 h, respectively) were higher than those of free CSH (36.1, 28.0, and 23.2 h, respectively). The MWCNTs–CSH conjugate showed higher Km (0.45 μmol) compared with the free CSH (0.41 μmol), whereas Vmax for the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate was smaller than that for free CSH. The MWCNTs–CSH conjugate morphology was examined using transmission electron microscope.
Keywords: Aspergillus flavus, immobilization, multiwalled carbon nanotubes, saponin hydrolase, soyasapogenol B, soybean saponins
|How to cite this article:|
Amin HA, Haroun AA. Comparative studies of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus onto functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes for soyasapogenol B production. Egypt Pharmaceut J 2017;16:138-43
|How to cite this URL:|
Amin HA, Haroun AA. Comparative studies of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus onto functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes for soyasapogenol B production. Egypt Pharmaceut J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 9];16:138-43. Available from: http://www.epj.eg.net/text.asp?2017/16/3/138/221487
| Introduction|| |
Nanobiocatalysis, which refers to the application of enzymes immobilized on nanostructured materials, has attracted considerable interest in recent years . Immobilization of enzymes onto a high surface area of nanomaterials resulted in higher enzyme loading  and improved enzyme properties, including its stability and activity . Among nanostructured materials, carbon nanotubes (CNT) have attracted considerable interest for their extraordinary structural, mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties ,. CNTs are one-dimensional nanomaterials that consist of concentric rolled graphene sheets with a length in the size of micrometers and diameter up to 100 nm . In addition to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) can also be used to immobilize enzymes . Enzyme immobilization onto the surface of CNTs can be achieved using various methods, namely, physical adsorption  and covalent bonding  of enzymes. Recently, it was found that enzymes can be specifically and precisely bound onto CNTs through specific functional groups that are introduced at their surfaces by functionalization with organic, polymeric, and biological molecules ,.
Soybean saponins are triterpenoid glycosides present in soybeans and other legumes . They are composed of an oleanane-type triterpenoid aglycone (soyasapogenols) to which sugar residues are attached . These saponins are reported to have many biological properties, but soyasapogenols are generally more bioactive compared with their glycosides. Saponin hydrolase hydrolyzes soybean saponins group B into their aglycone soyasapogenol B (SB). SB has been reported to have many bioactive properties, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, hepatoprotective, antivirus, and antimutagenic activities . Here, saponin hydrolase was selected as a model enzyme and immobilized on carbon nanomaterial. Aspergillus flavus saponin hydrolase was reported mainly to be a cell membrane enzyme . Thus, we investigated the possibility of covalent immobilization of A. flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase (A. flavus CSH) on oxidized MWCNTs directly and by carbodiimide or glutaraldehyde (GA) chemistry. Eventually, a comparative study between the free and immobilized CSH in terms of their catalytic activity, thermal stability, and kinetic properties was carried out.
| Materials and methods|| |
Aspergillus flavus culture and media
A. flavus isolated from peanut pods was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA-Difco; Laboratories Inc., Livonia, MI, US). Soybean saponin hydrolase production was carried out in production medium consisting of 20 g/l soybean saponin, 40 g/l malt extract, 20 g/l yeast extract, 2 g/l KH2PO4, 2 g/l (NH4)2SO4, 0.3 g/l MgSO4 · 7H2O, and 0.3 g/l CaCl2 · 2H2O with a pH adjusted initially to 9.0 for 48 h at 30°C and 150 rpm.
Oxidation and purification of multiwalled carbon nanotubes
Pure MWCNT (3.0 g) was dispersed in mixed concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids (3 : 1, v/v) at a ratio of 50 ml acid mixture per 10 mg of MWCNT . The resulting mixture was then refluxed at 110°C overnight with continuous stirring to produce oxidized CNTs (MWCNTs–COOH). The samples were washed with ultrapure water until the filtrate became neutral (pH: 7.0). The collected solid was dried under vacuum at 70°C for 12 h. The resulting material was labeled Ox-MWCNTs and set aside for further modification.
Modification of Ox-multiwalled carbon nanotubes
An amount of 10 mg of Ox-MWCNTs was dispersed in 20 ml HEPES [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid] buffer and 100 mM N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) was added. The mixture was sonicated for 30 min, followed by the addition of 20 mM 1-ethyl-3-[3-(di-methylamino) propyl] carbodiimide (EDC) to initiate coupling of NHS to the carboxylic groups on the Ox-MWCNTs. The ester complex Ox-MWCNTs/EDC was rinsed thoroughly with buffer to remove excess NHS and EDC. Finally, the material obtained was suspended in 20 mM pH 7.5 HEPES buffer for further investigation .
In other experiments, 5 mg of Ox-MWCNTs were sonicated in 9 ml phosphate buffer (PB, 50 mM, pH: 7.5) for 1 h in the presence of 110 μl Tween 20. After the dispersion of nanomaterials, GA was added to prepare a 4% (w/w) solution and the volume was adjusted to 11 ml. The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 min under stirring. The modified nanomaterials (MWCNTs/GA) were separated by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 30 min and washed with buffer solution. Then, 10 ml of PB (50 mM, pH: 7.5) solution was added and the nanomaterials were sonicated for 1 h to form a homogeneous suspension .
Immobilization of Aspergillus flavus cell saponin hydrolase on multiwalled carbon nanotubes
An amount of 5 mg of the prepared nanomaterials (Ox-MWCNTs, Ox-MWCNTs/EDC, and Ox-MWCNTs/GA) were sonicated in 10 ml PB (50 mM, pH: 7.5) for ∼30 min. Then, 5–20 mg of lyophilized A. flavus CSH were added and the mixture was incubated under stirring for 1 h at 30°C and then overnight at 4°C. The resulting bioconjugates MWCNTs–CSH, MWCNTs/GA–CSH, and MWCNTs/EDC–CSH were collected separately by centrifugation and then washed several times with buffer. SH activities of the initial CSH, immobilized CSH preparations and in the washing buffer (unbound cells) were determined. The immobilization yield (IY, %) was calculated as follows:
where I is the saponin hydrolase activity units of the immobilized cells, A is the initial activity units offered for immobilization, and B is the activity units of the unbound cells.
Measurement of enzymatic activity
The reaction mixture containing free or immobilized CSH was incubated at pH 5.5 and 45°C using soybean saponin (0.2%, w/v) as a substrate. Reaction products were extracted with ethyl acetate. A volume of 50 μl of ethyl acetate-containing reaction products were diluted with 450 μl of the mobile phase, acetonitrile–methanol–water (50/15/35). A volume of 10 µl of this dilution was analyzed by HPLC and the quantity of SB in the sample was determined by comparison with authentic SB . One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 μmol of aglycone per min from the substrate.
Determination of kinetic parameters and optimum temperature
Km, Vmax, and optimum temperature were determined by changing individually the conditions of the saponin hydrolase activity assay (soybean saponin concentration from 0.5 to 4% and temperature from 20 to 70°C). Km and Vmax were calculated from Lineweaver–Burk plots .
Thermal stability of both free and immobilized CSH was evaluated by measuring the saponin hydrolase residual activity of CSH samples exposed to various temperatures (70–90°C) in PB (0.2 M, pH: 6), with different time intervals (1, 2, and 3 h) for each temperature, and the residual activity was then measured.
Activation energy (Ea)
Ea is defined as ‘the minimum energy required to start a chemical reaction and given in units of kcal/moles. The temperature dependence of the rate constant, for values below the temperature of inactivation, can be described by the Arrhenius equation: K=A×e−Ea/RT, where K is the rate constant, A is the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy, R is the gas constant (R=1.976 cal/mol/K or 8.314 J/mol/K), and T is the absolute temperature. The apparent activation energy of free and immobilized enzymes was determined from the slope of logarithmic of the activity versus the reciprocal of Kelvin temperature (slope=−Ea/2.303R) .
Half-life and the deactivation constant rate
The half-life of an enzyme is the time that it takes for the activity to reduce to a half of the original activity. It was determined by plotting the log of residual activity against time, at temperatures causing inactivation (60, 70, and 90°C), according to the following equation :
Deactivation energy=slope of the straight line.
| Results and discussion|| |
Immobilization of Aspergillus flavus cell saponin hydrolase on Ox-multiwalled carbon nanotubes
A. flavus CSH were immobilized on MWCNTs using three methods, namely, directly on Ox-MWCNT (sample 1 using CSH to nanomaterial weight ratio of 4 : 1), on Ox-MWCNTs/EDC ester complex (samples 2, 3, and 4 using CSH to nanomaterial weight ratios of 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1, respectively), and on Ox-MWCNT in the presence of GA as a crosslinker (sample 5 using CSH to a nanomaterial weight ratio of 4 : 1). The results in [Table 1] show that the highest cells’ IY of 79.23% was observed in case of direct immobilization on Ox-MWCNT (sample 1). It could also be observed that the formulation using GA as a crosslinker showed a slightly lower IY value of 68.8%, whereas formulations using the Ox-MWCNTs/EDC ester complex were accompanied by much lower IYs ranging from about 22 to 41%; this could be attributed to the inhibitory effect of this complex on cells’ enzyme activity or to the high leakage of cells during the immobilization process. Therefore, the direct immobilization of CSH on Ox-MWCNT was chosen as the most suitable method. The fungal cell wall has been shown to be primarily composed of chitin, glucans, mannans, and glycoproteins . This means that it has various free hydroxyl, amine, carbonyl, carboxyl, and imidazole carboxyl groups that offer active sites for covalent binding to Ox-MWCNT in the presence or absence of a crosslinker (GA) . [Figure 1]a shows unloaded Ox-MWCNT, whereas [Figure 1]b shows the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate. It was found that CSH were adsorbed on MWCNTs and also appeared in between nanotubes; this yielded more separated and size diameter tubes ([Figure 1]b). However, unloaded Ox-MWCNTs were appeared aggregated and sticky to each other.
|Table 1 Immobilization of Aspergillus flavus cells on different carbon nanotubes preparations|
Click here to view
|Figure 1 Transmission electron microscope images of unloaded Ox-MWCNTs (a) and MWCNTs–CSH conjugate (b). CSH, whole-cell saponin hydrolase; MWCNTs, multiwalled carbon nanotubes.|
Click here to view
Comparative study of free Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase and the multiwalled carbon nanotubes–whole-cell saponin hydrolase conjugate
Effect of temperature on free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase
The optimal temperature of free CSH and the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate was 50°C (see [Figure 2]). Furthermore, the enzyme activity of the free form was higher than that of the immobilized form. This is mainly because of the mass transport resistance to the substrate onto the carrier  and thus the lower effective concentration of substrate. This explains why the calculated value of the activation energy (Ea) for the free CSH was lower than that of the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate (1.05 and 2.84 kcal/mol, respectively) ([Table 2]).
|Figure 2 Effect of temperature on the enzyme activity of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase (CSH).|
Click here to view
|Table 2 Kinetics parameters of free whole-cell saponin hydrolase and the multiwalled carbon nanotubes–whole-cell saponin hydrolase conjugate|
Click here to view
Thermal stability of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus cell saponin hydrolase
It was found that free CSH retained more than 90% of its saponin hydrolase activity at 70°C during all the incubation periods and were generally inactivated at a much slower rate than the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate (data not shown). Also, the free CHS retained 73.3% of the original activity compared with 60.5% retained activity of the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate after 3 h incubation at the same temperature (90°C, data not shown). However, the calculated half-life values of the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate (55, 33.3, and 29.7 h) were higher than those of free CSH (36.1, 29, and 23.2 h) at 70, 80, and 90°C, respectively ([Table 3]). The high thermal stability of both free and immobilized CSH could be attributed to the high protection of saponin hydrolase enzyme inside cells  or the thermal stability of the enzyme itself.
|Table 3 Half-life time and deactivation rate constants at different temperatures of free whole-cell saponin hydrolase and the multiwalled carbon nanotubes–whole-cell saponin hydrolase conjugate|
Click here to view
Storage stability of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase
In terms of the storage stability, the free and immobilized cells retained high residual activities: about 73.5 and 67.6%, respectively, of their original saponin hydrolase activity at 25°C after 48 days (Figure 3). This extended stability could be attributed to the prevention of structural denaturation as a result of the protection of the enzyme inside the cells in both cases . Furthermore, higher residual activities were retained by the free cells compared with the immobilized ones at 4 and −30°C. This could be attributed to the probability of the inhibition effect of MWCNTs on saponin hydrolase activity over time.
|Figure 3 Storage stability of Aspergillus flavus free (a) and immobilized (b) whole-cell saponin hydrolase preserved at 25°C (room temperature), 4°C, and −30°C for 48 days.|
Click here to view
Kinetic properties of free and immobilized Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase
Both free CSH and the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate generally followed conventional Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetics with soyasaponin as the substrate ([Figure 4]). The results summarized in [Table 2] show that the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate retained a maximum reaction velocity (Vmax) of 0.031±0.003 μmol/ml/min with a corresponding substrate concentration at a half-maximal reaction velocity (Km) of 10.45±0.015 μmol. However, free CSH yielded a higher Vmax value of 0.038±0.004 μmol/ml/min and a slightly lower Km value of 0.41±0.019 μmol. With respect to their catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km), free CSH had a catalytic efficiency of 0.092 min compared with 0.068 for the MWCNTs–CSH conjugate.
|Figure 4 Effect of substrate concentration on Aspergillus flavus free and immobilized whole-cell saponin hydrolase. CSH, whole-cell saponin hydrolase.|
Click here to view
The reuse number of immobilized CSH is one of the most important aspects of industrial application. An increased stability could make the immobilized enzyme more advantageous than the free form . The immobilized A. flavus CSH were reused five times; the cells were separated from the reaction mixture before and after extraction with ethyl acetate after each cycle, as shown in [Figure 5]. In both cases (with and without ethyl acetate extraction), the residual activity decreased gradually to 5.4 and 3.4%, respectively. Thus, the immobilized CSH activities decreased while the reused number increased. The activity decay during recycling may have been related to inactivation of the enzyme caused by denaturation of the protein, or the adsorption and accumulation of reaction products on the biocatalyst . The latter reason is obvious on comparing the produced activity at the first cycle when the cells were separated from the reaction mixture before and after extraction with ethyl acetate (30.9 and 6.2 U/g, respectively).
|Figure 5 Operational stability of the immobilized Aspergillus flavus whole-cell saponin hydrolase. The 100% residual activity corresponds to 515.5 mU/g.|
Click here to view
| Conclusion|| |
In this study, an innovative nanobiocatalytic system was developed through the immobilization of A. flavus CSH on carbon-based nanomaterials for biotransformation of soybean saponins into SB. It was observed that A. flavus CSH interacts differently with Ox-MWCNT depending on the method implemented. Although CSH maintained much of its activity (80%) when directly immobilized onto Ox-MWNTs, this was not the case when carbodiimide or GA chemistry was used. Compared with free CSH, the MWCNT–CSH conjugate showed higher Km value, activation energy, and half-lives, and lower Vmax value and deactivation constant rate.
Financial support and sponsorship
The authors thank the National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt, for the financial support through the tenth Research Grant (2013–2016) in the framework of the 10070301 project.Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Kim J, Grate JW, Wang P. Nanobiocatalysis and its potential applications. Trends Biotechnol 2008; 26:639–646.
Wang P. Nanoscale biocatalyst systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2006; 17:574–579.
Kuchibhatla SVNT, Karakoti AS, Bera D, Seal S. One dimensional nanostructured materials. Prog Mater Sci 2007; 52:699–913.
Tasis D, Tagmatarchis N, Bianco A, Prato M, Tasis D, Tagmatarchis N et al.
Chemistry of carbon nanotubes chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev 2006; 106:1105–1136.
Feng W, Ji P. Enzymes immobilized on carbon nanotubes. Biotechnol Adv 2011; 29:889–895.
Cang-Rong JT, Pastorin G. The influence of carbon nanotubes on enzyme activity and structure: investigation of different immobilization procedures through enzyme kinetics and circular dichroism studies. Nanotechnology 2009; 20:255102.
Gao Y, Kyratzis I. Covalent immobilization of proteins on carbon nanotubes using the cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide − a critical assessment. Bioconjug Chem 2008; 19:1945–1950.
Pavlidis IV, Tsoufis T, Enotiadis A, Gournis D, Stamatis H. Functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes for lipase immobilization. Adv Eng Mater 2010; 12:179–183.
Zhang W, Popovich DG. Chemical and biological characterization of oleanane triterpenoids from soy. Molecules 2009; 14:2959–2975.
Haroun A, Amin H, Abd El-Alim S. Preparation, characterization and in vitro
biological activity of soyasapogenol B loaded onto functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Curr Bioact Compd 2017; 13:1–1.
Amin HA, Ahmed FM, Awad HM, Mohamed SS, Shokeer A. Extraction and partial purification of aspergillus flavus
cell wall associated saponin hydrolase. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 2017; in press.
Wang L, Wei L, Chen Y, Jiang R. Specific and reversible immobilization of NADH oxidase on functionalized carbon nanotubes. J Biotechnol 2010; 150:57–63.
Pavlidis IV, Vorhaben T, Tsoufis T, Rudolf P, Bornscheuer UT, Gournis D et al.
Development of effective nanobiocatalytic systems through the immobilization of hydrolases on functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials. Bioresour Technol 2012; 115:164–171.
Watanabe M, Sumida N, Yanai K, Murakami T. A novel saponin hydrolase from Neocosmospora vasinfecta
. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70:865–872.
Amin HAS, El-Menoufy HA, El-Mehalawy AA, Mostafa ES. Biosynthesis of glycyrrhetinic acid 3-O-mono-β-d-glucuronide by free and immobilized Aspergillus terreus
β-d-glucuronidase. J Mol Catal B Enzym 2011; 69:6–10.
Ortega N, Perez-Mateos M, Pilar MC, Busto MD. Neutrase immobilization on alginate−glutaraldehyde beads by covalent attachment. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 57:109–115.
Kumar S, Kikon K, Upadhyay A, Kanwar SS, Gupta R. Production, purification, and characterization of lipase from thermophilic and alkaliphilic Bacillus coagulans
BTS-3. Protein Expr Purif 2005; 41:38–44.
Bowman SM, Free SJ. The structure and synthesis of the fungal cell wall. Bio Essays 2006; 28:799–808.
Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N. Mycorrhiza–eco-physiology, secondary metabolites, nanomaterials. AG, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
Abdul Rahim MZ, Lee PM, Lee KH. Butyl acetate synthesis using immobilized lipase in calcium alginate beads. Malaysian J Anal Sci 2008; 12:575–585.
He Q, Shi H, Gu H, Naka G, Ding H, Li X et al.
Immobilization of Rhizopus oryzae
ly6 onto loofah sponge as a whole-cell biocatalyst for biodiesel production. Bio Resources 2016; 11:850–860.
Su E, Xia T, Gao L, Dai Q, Zhang Z. Immobilization of β-glucosidase and its aroma-increasing effect on tea beverage. Food Bioprod Process 2010; 88:83–89.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]